GPTZero Research Motivates Major arXiv Ban on AI and Hallucinated Citations

ArXiv, the preprint repository widely used across computer science and mathematics, is tightening its rules on AI-generated research papers, introducing a one-year ban for authors who submit work containing clear evidence that AI outputs were not verified before submission. Thomas Dietterich, chair of arXiv’s computer science section, announced that hallucinated references or visible prompts to […]

ArXiv is doing more to crack down on the careless use of large language models in scientific papers.

ArXiv, a popular platform for preprint academic research, is taking a new step to attempt to reduce the volume of papers that include AI slop. If a paper has "incontrovertible evidence that the authors did not check the results of LLM generation," such as hallucinated references or "meta-comments" left by an LLM, authors will be banned from ArXiv for a year, according to Thomas Dietterich, ArXiv's section chair of its computer science section. Future ArXiv submissions will also have to be accepted at "a reputable peer-reviewed venue." Here's what he said on X: Attention @arxiv authors: Our Code of Conduct states that by signing your name … Read the full story at The Verge.

One of the site's moderators described the new policy on social media.

A new paper out of arXiv this week describes an AI system that builds, improves, and deploys its own specialist agents. Here is what that actually means for engineers and technical teams.

The need for tighter oversight was felt following recent developments, including two controversies around explicit AI-generated content on Grok, the AI chatbot embedded in social media platform X.