The best JavaScript certifications for getting hired

A supply chain attack on SAP-related npm packages has put fresh scrutiny on the developer tools and build workflows that enterprises rely on to produce software. The campaign, referred to as “mini Shai-Hulud,” affected packages used in SAP’s JavaScript and cloud application development ecosystem. The malicious versions added installation-time code that could steal developer credentials, GitHub and npm tokens, GitHub Actions secrets, and cloud credentials from AWS, Azure, GCP, and Kubernetes environments. Researchers at SafeDep, Aikido Security, Wiz, and several other security firms said the affected packages included mbt@1.2.48, @cap-js/db-service@2.10.1, @cap-js/postgres@2.2.2, and @cap-js/sqlite@2.2.2. The suspicious versions were published on April 29 and were later replaced by safe releases. The malware encrypted stolen data and sent it to public GitHub repositories created from victims’ own accounts, according to the researchers. It also used stolen GitHub and npm tokens to add ma

JavaScript and Node.js teams do not lack security tools. What they still lack is a dependency security workflow that developers will actually use before release. That is the real gap. A package gets installed, CI (continuous integration) runs, a scanner executes somewhere in the pipeline, and eventually a report appears. From a distance, that can look like maturity. In practice, it often means developers learn about dependency risks too late, too indirectly, and with too little clarity to act while the fix is still easy. The real problem in JavaScript and Node.js security is no longer detection. It is actionability. That is why so many teams can say they scan dependencies and still struggle to answer the questions that matter right before release. What exactly is vulnerable? Is it direct or transitive? Is there a fixed version? Can I fix it in my own project, or am I blocked behind an upstream dependency? Which finding deserves attention first? Those are not edge cases. That is the rea

HTMX has been considered feature-complete for some time. It is a successful project that achieves its ambitious goals and is widely hailed, not to mention widely deployed in production. HTMX 2.0 was considered the final word. The creator promised there would be no HTMX 3.0.  So of course, being developers, the HTMX team decided to rip out the engine and replace it with a new one based on JavaScript’s Fetch API. They named the new version HTMX 4.0 to keep the promise. Here is a fascinating tale of architecture and implementation that gives us a beautiful window into the inner machinations of the front-end industry.  Simpler web development When asked for comment on the 3.0 leap frogging, HTMX Carson Gross gave me a one word quote: “Oops.” – Carson Gross, creator of HTMX Gross is one of my favorite industry personalities. It’s easy to see why. He created the Grug Brained Developer as well as HTMX. The former contains all the hard-bitten advice from a veteran coder that young grugs need

According to Stack Overflow and Atlassian, developers lose between 6 and 10 hours every week searching for information or clarifying unclear documentation. For a 50-developer team, that adds up to $675,000–$1.1 million in wasted productivity every year. This is not just a tooling issue. It is a retrieval problem.Enterprises have plenty of data but lack […] The post Rethinking Enterprise Search: How Cortex Search Turns Data into Business Impact  appeared first on Analytics Vidhya.