Adam Back dismisses BIP-110 censorship claims as fork debate returns
The post Adam Back dismisses BIP-110 censorship claims as fork debate returns appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. A fresh Bitcoin debate has broken out on X after Mr.Hodl linked Roger Ver’s old censorship criticism with new complaints from GrassFedBitcoin about BIP-110 discussion channels. Summary Mr.Hodl linked Roger Ver and GrassFedBitcoin as Bitcoin’s BIP-110 moderation dispute moved back online again. Adam Back rejected censorship claims, saying BIP-110 was ignored because critics already debated it extensively. The proposal seeks to restrict non-monetary Bitcoin data, but opponents warn about fork risks ahead. Mr.Hodl posted a short message placing Roger Ver and GrassFedBitcoin side by side. The post came with screenshots showing Ver’s 2019 claim that BTC had failed on censorship resistance by censoring parts of its community. The second screenshot showed GrassFedBitcoin arguing that BIP-110 critics should engage directly if they believe the proposal is wrong. The account claimed